<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Job Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joepfeiffer.com/2006/09/06/good-job-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joepfeiffer.com/2006/09/06/good-job-facebook/</link>
	<description>Product Manager at The Wall Street Journal and Creative Director at Bespoke Web Apps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:17:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. Arty</title>
		<link>http://joepfeiffer.com/2006/09/06/good-job-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>P. Arty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ijfp.com/wordpress/?p=129#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Josef, I disagree with your positivity about the new facebook &quot;news&quot; feed.  It&#039;s ridiculous.  Who the hell cares if someone I talked to three times in high school doesn&#039;t consider &quot;Rounders&quot; a favorite movie anymore?  At least 90% of the feed is a horrible waste of space.  If sifting through this crap increases your efficiency, then you are a clodhopper.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I do agree, however, that this in no way violates privacy.  Anyone receiving your &quot;news&quot; on their &quot;news&quot; feed could find that information anyway.  People who are freaking about that are clowns.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I still maintain that the feature is horrendous.  There&#039;s no need for that much detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josef, I disagree with your positivity about the new facebook &#8220;news&#8221; feed.  It&#8217;s ridiculous.  Who the hell cares if someone I talked to three times in high school doesn&#8217;t consider &#8220;Rounders&#8221; a favorite movie anymore?  At least 90% of the feed is a horrible waste of space.  If sifting through this crap increases your efficiency, then you are a clodhopper.</p>
<p>I do agree, however, that this in no way violates privacy.  Anyone receiving your &#8220;news&#8221; on their &#8220;news&#8221; feed could find that information anyway.  People who are freaking about that are clowns.</p>
<p>I still maintain that the feature is horrendous.  There&#8217;s no need for that much detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

